![]() |
 |
|
 |
|
Watch-Movies-links.net - Archive, Large Collection of Free Full Length Movies.
Watch Video Online, Download Stream Content. Movie times, bootleg, trailers, reviews, soundtrack.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
![]()
Watch Dawn of the Dead (2004) Online Free:
|
|
|
Movie Genres: |
|
|
 |

Dawn of the Dead (2004) Comments: |

6 months
aznassassin
34 posts |
2012-10-26
|
Okay, first and foremost, the zombies themselves have issues. They DONT behave like zombies. They REACT to injury. Minor injuries can CRIPPLE them. They can PICK UP things and USE things. They can think for crying out loud. They can RUN. And why is the incubation period so erratically different its ridiculous. The protagonist's husband who is bitten at the start of the movie turns like a few seconds whereas another character who I wont mention to avoid spoiling the plot turns after what seems like a WEEK after being bitten. Its ridiculous. Oh and get what, BURNING zombies kills them. I can hear people cutting themselves to that/ Pro tip to those out there who dont know how to the survive the zombie apocalypse: Zombies are DEAD people who are infected with a BLOOD-BORNE virus (though this is debatable in other variations) that kills the host and takes control of their body after they are deceased. They want to feast on ALL living things INCLUDING animals. They are slow and can at best, jog if a prey attracts them. They can grab for things mindlessly but they CANT open doors, use weapons or pick up things, Zack Snyder! Nor can they be CRIPPLE by minor wounds like gunshots - they DONT feel PAIN, they're DEAD. Oh and Mr Snyder, the makeup of the zombies, why do they look like HUMANS instead of badly mauled walking corpses? The lines are horrible at times while at other instances they're brilliantly written. There are some tense moments but in most cases, you'll be just yelling at the screen and be utterly frustrated at how ridiculously naive, dumb and stupid the characters are. Seriously. For instance, stupidity No. 1: NO ONE knew what made the people turn into zombies despite many of them seeing people get bitten and turning e.g the protagonist's husband. Not only until around 1/3 of the way into the movie do the main characters realize "Oh maybe its the bite?" *facepalm* You are tell obviously who's gonna die (and they do) and you'll be cutting yourself at the most stupidass things the characters would do. WHY, WHY would you GO AFTER your DOG amidst the HUNDREDS of zombies that want to EAT you IF you know they WONT hurt your dog? Srsly that thing there, is what caused the plot to climax and end as it did. Had that certain character NOT gone after her dog and stayed with the plan, I am sure NO ONE would've been killed. And WHY do the characters just use **** pistols and shotguns? You have a GUNSTORE for God's sakes, there are things called RIFLES that are MORE accurate and also automatic & semi-automatic weapons all with a crapload of ammo. Why not just clear the streets? Why not use the damn rifles? Seriously the ENTIRE movie, they just stick to horrible horrible pistols (GLOCKS just damn GLOCKS for crying out loud. There must be Desert Eagles and M9's lying around in the store!) and those mediocre cop shotguns. Had they used a M16, M4A1 Carbine, SAW machine gun or hell even a plain old Lee Einfield, I am sure everyone would've survived. This is a movie that you watch drunk with your buddies on a Friday night. You'll probably watch it and forget about it, and probably switch to playing Left 4 Dead. The original 1970's Dawn of the Dead is vastly superior despite the outdated makeup effects. Watch that. Avoid this insult to the zombie canon pile of excrement at all costs. Hell even the ending is lacking. A braindead film that absolutely wont want to feast upon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

11 months
hollowfication
14 posts |
2012-06-03
|
i like it but only problem is it no remero movie it remake of his classic movie but i prefer the original the zombie in this one are fast ones show in this movie decaying look of zombies. but no matter what i like remero ones
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
rotku
84 posts |
2012-04-09
|
One of the better zombie horror efforts of the last few years. It's not as apocalyptic as Romeros original but the storyline works well and the action scenes are good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
RegOz
102 posts |
2012-03-03
|
I am not really into gore, but this movie is fantastic in its genre. Beyond the gore, the construction of the characters is good; although, they had some fairly stereotypical ones (that is one of the reasons why I don't give this movie a 10). From a more analytical perspective, it is not just about horror, but also about how in extreme situations our human condition can either betray us, or strengthen us. Fate plays a role in our lives, but we always have a choice, even if there doesn't seem to be one. I definitely recommend it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
eTurkey
59 posts |
2012-02-08
|
Unfortunately, the Dawn of the Dead remake (original was made in 1978) didn't live up to the prior expectations I had placed on the film upon hearing how good it is from my friends. Character development was virtually non-existent as the director instead opted to introduce more unnecessary empty shells as the movie progressed. The blood and gore was fine yet the zombies seemed more human than any recent flick of the same genre that I've seen recently. There's also a few cheesy moments which could have been left out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
j30
162 posts |
2011-11-27
|
Zombies can run. Oh ****. Zach Snyder is behind the camera for this "better than average" remake of the great Dawn of the Dead. What makes this movie better than other horror remakes is that you actually care about the characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
asylumspadez
162 posts |
2011-11-19
|
A great remake if you ask me. It was entertaining and interesting through out. Its nice to see a franchise get a much needed reboot and be a sucessful reboot as well. Acting wasnt good though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
ApocalypseGamer
13 posts |
2011-11-05
|
YES! This remake of Romero's original film is WAY much better. A perfect cast, with suspense, more zombies, action, and a very fantastic plot. If you like zombies - Watch this film!
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
grandpajoe6191
504 posts |
2011-09-27
|
I never watched the original, but what I would recommend for "Dawn of the Dead" is to make a survival horror game rather than a movie. The ideas are fresh and tense, but its displayed using the wrong techniques.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

1 year
AtTheMovies
38 posts |
2011-06-29
|
In order to judge this movie, you must look at it in two ways. First, since it is billed as a remake of the original, and not a re-imagining, one must look at how it holds up to the original. The original is, by far better then this. The remake lacks the overarching criticism of consumerism that the original had. The remake specials effects are obviously better, but that is a given. The original is scarier in the traditional sense. The remake is almost more of a thriller. Many plot points are not carried over into the remake. Both versions deliver what you want, a great zombie movie with lots of zombies kills and suspense. So, when compared to the original, it scores around a 6.5. However, when looking at the film in it's on right, if you saw this before the original, it is much better. The special effects as mentioned are very good. There is a large cast of characters, so there are lots of main character deaths. We seem to be left with only the characters we pity at the end, which is good. When not compared with the original, the plot is refreshing. There are plenty of suspenseful sequences, and a great introduction to what the world has come to through the eyes of the main character. No zombie movie is complete without a great introduction to the zombie ridden world. The remake triumphs the original in that sense, since we already knew what happened in the original, based on events in Night of the Living Dead. The film also does a good job of making the mall seem real, by creating a lot of fake, yet believable brands. So, in it's own right, without looking at the original, the remake of Dawn of the Dead would get an 8.75. So, when averaged with the score of a 6.5 when compared with the original, the remake of Dawn of the Dead would get a 7.625. That rounds up to an 8, which is my score for the remake. That is of course compared to the 10 that I would give the original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

2 years
TheNewSpielberg
42 posts |
2011-05-01
|
As much as I love Romero's 1978 classic, I must agree with fellow movie buffs who say that this particular remake was unfairly prejudiced and slandered upon release. The movie sticks pretty much to the basic plot; a group of people hide out in an abandoned shopping center during a zombie apocalypse. That's all there is to it. The acting was good and some of the comedy moments were actually pretty funny (Hollywood Squares, anyone?). Of course, seeing as it was shot in the modern era of the zombie flick, there is just enough blood and huts to satisfy any gorehound. The zombies looked scary and WERE scary simply due to the fact that they could sprint (a cliche started by 28 Days Later). The heavy metal soundtrack really helped the atmosphere of a zombie invasion and went great with zombie-killing. In sum, an underrated horror movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

2 years
TheQuietGamer
252 posts |
2011-03-06
|
This may seem like a b rated movie but it's not it's surprisingly well made movie, truly enjoyable if your into the zombie movie genre like I am, if you are this is a must see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

2 years
ArkonBlade
112 posts |
2010-12-28
|
the original dawn of the dead is easily the best zombie movie ever done ... the remake not so much . it does stick to the whole survivors holding out in the mall set up but thats really about it . its not a bad film but doesnt have the magic the original has . the zombie baby how ever was a creepy little thing .
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

2 years
hampusforev
3 posts |
2010-10-24
|
Sometimes you wonder whether people even watched this movie or just dismissed it as "lesser" than the favorite Romero-classic from 78 without even giving it a chance. I mean "Paranormal Activity", the worst **** atrocity I've ever seen, has a better metascore. I'm probably one of the most pretentious cinema snobs that you'll ever meet, but I loved this movie. It's miles better than the original, which is revolutionary, sure, but has much flatter characters and lesser development. And don't give me any of the "striking critique of capitalism"-nonsense; that "mall-shoppers are like zombies" is as shallow a symbol as a 14-year-old punk-rocker who just discovered Bill Hicks would come up with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

3 years
Paola
127 posts |
2009-10-11 04:10:59
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |

3 years
bitethekerb
2 posts |
2009-05-29 21:34:47
|
old but still a good film i see this before but i still watched it and i find this amazing worth the watch 4/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
 |
|
 |
|
|
You must Register and login to post a comment!.
We currently sort out 99% of overall comments.
Absolutly no allowed: offensive, threatening speech, race, religion,
sexual orientation, culture, nationality and other insults. If your
post don't follow this rule or/and contain at least one single hate or forbidden word like (f**k) it will go to trashbox, don't waste your and our time. |
 |
"Dawn of the Dead (2004) " Comments
|
| (Discuss, thoughts, opinions, reviews, comments) : |
| |
|
|
|
Registration requred to post comments, Please login or register
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
WatchMan |
Due a large amount of 'bad reports' related to our sponsor's links on our new, especially 'now showing in theaters' blockbusters movies pages.
Please note that these are sponsor's text links on all pages and they in no way mean that the sponsors have the movies for streaming or provide links to the movies for streaming. The "Watch Full Movie" links are also sponsor's links promoting XviD codec and Graboid membership. The flash player is a flash banner displaying the ads and it no way that it will play any movies upon installation of XviD codec or Graboid video. We are a movie community that has a great format for in depth movie discussions.
|
Disclaimer:
Watch-Movies.net.in(Titled as Watch Movies and Watch Movies online) is absolutely legal and contain only comments, reviews, and discussions of movies. We do not provide links to copyrighted material, we do not host any copyrighted material, and we do not link to any sites that link to or host copyrighted material. Watch-movies.net.in list popular movies, new movies, and just released movies merely for reviews and discussions. Watch movies link to sponsor and advertisers where users can watch movies where these sponsors and advertisers have licensed to provide streaming to their paid/trial members. Our current sponsors are and not limited to ireel.com, flixstra.com, graboid.com. watch-movies.net.in is not responsible for the accuracy, compliance, copyright, legality, decency, or any other aspect of the content of other linked sites. If you have any legal issues please contact appropriate media file owners / hosters.
|
|
|
 |
|
|