 King Kong (2005) Comments: |
6 months
Broadway
290 posts |
2012-11-17
|
Peter Jackson takes no limits while he impresses us with his latest visual (and also emotional) masterpiece "King Kong". The running time which is three hours seems exhausting, but it's all worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
6 months
cameronmorewood
1116 posts |
2012-11-08
|
King Kong opens up quietly asking questions and provoking thoughts. It then entrances us by plucking us from our chairs and throwing us into a dazzling and breath-taking fantasy world created with some incredible special effects. To seal the deal, in its last hour, it grows close to our hearts and then floors us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
6 months
GlobeTheatre
65 posts |
2012-10-28
|
This was a fine movie. Liked everything in it; the direction, the script, the characters, the visual side of the movie... Everything was fine. I liked it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
7 months
Regulus
98 posts |
2012-10-13
|
This was a fine movie. Liked everything in it; the direction, the script, the characters, the visual side of the movie... Everything was fine. I liked it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
9 months
Stonehenge
45 posts |
2012-08-12
|
Storytelling: 10/10. Acting: 10/10. Technical side of the movie: 10/10. Directing: 10/10. Film Editing: 10/10. Drama: 10/10. Comedy: 10/10. Overall: 10/10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
9 months
Strudel
172 posts |
2012-08-04
|
My metascore would be 85 out of 100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
10 months
Pedobear
11 posts |
2012-07-08
|
Pedobear likes everyone! .
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
10 months
Dufflad
9 posts |
2012-06-30
|
The more I watch this movie, the crappier it gets. Why? Because half of it is just screaming.. The acting was crap for the most part, I hate to **** talk Peter Jackson, but sorry man, this one was good for its time, but it has died to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
11 months
Zilcell
871 posts |
2012-05-25
|
King Kong has very jaw dropping brawls with Kong. The story is everything that King Kong is and should be. Its a great remake and a very memorable story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
Critic2012
289 posts |
2012-04-21
|
With KING KONG, Peter Jackson has added yet another epic film to his resume'. Ground-breaking special effects, along with an excellent plot and cast, makes the film thoroughly engrossing, (and at times, terrifying). The only drawback is the length. (And many agree on this point). The film could have intensified exponentially if only it was a good two and a half hours instead of three and change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
watithink123
179 posts |
2012-04-15
|
Best King Kong by a long shot. Worth watching with a friend and much better than the other ones. King Kong 7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
Trev29
270 posts |
2012-04-02
|
Anything by Jackson is great. Great visuals and music. This movie was a little too long and I didn't think they developed enough time for the love between them. Still, a good movie all around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
Juanolo
59 posts |
2012-03-31
|
First off, this is a 9.5 out of 10. Effects are spectacular. To king kong, to environments, to dinosaurs, to epic airplane battles, this movies have awesome visual effects. Score is good, Acting well done, and story is good. Probably long and pulled on but still good. Overall, great movie. A great blockbuster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
csw12
297 posts |
2012-03-26
|
King Kong may not be as good as Jackson's previous films The Lord of the Rings but hey thats not fair. LOTR is in a class by itself. King Kong is a wonderful of action and love. Excellent story and music. Peter Jackson has done it again. It is truly one of the wonders of the holiday's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
Nero97
11 posts |
2012-01-09
|
Great movie, nice soundtrack and environment, but way to long. The movie is really good, but so long that it gets quite boring after some time...and it gets exciting again at the ending.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
schwarz_kellogg
12 posts |
2011-12-10
|
Quite good! The effects were tremendous. Even so is the fight scene between Kong & Dinosaurs!!! Very compelling!!! But after that, it's borin'... Too much effort in tellin' the Kong-going-NY story instead of the interaction between the duo and the 'triangle'...
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
MrZeekoe
1 posts |
2011-11-20
|
I dont care what other people say. For me it is one of the best movies ever! The action and graphics are awesome! Its just so sad that King Kong has to die so tragicly... I cry everytime I see the ending.... And im boy but i dont care...
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
FFStudios
1 posts |
2011-11-11
|
I'm honestly not sure how to start this off. First of all, lets get negatives out the way as usual: at over 3 hours long, the film feels bloated and stuffed with a noisy barrage of action sequences. Many of the creatures devised throughout the film (such as the V-rex) seem to go by the theory that 'the bigger it is, the scarier'. The film makes attempts at this cinematic intensity; with varying degrees of success ranging from surprising to plain flat. The action scenes are often disjointed and feel as if they are all competing to see who can make the most thrilling scene. Anyhow, rant over. The visual effects are admittitly very stunning, though sometimes overused. The acting is mostly solid and the underlying story isn't too bad, although the second act seems a complete jumbled narrative mess.
Overall, this is still a resonably made film that still manages to maintain its intensity and shock-and-awe moments when it needs to. Definately worth a look.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
imthecritic
1 posts |
2011-11-11
|
Saw this movie once again after a long time, and i still love it. Though better CGI will come in future years the emotions portrayed by kong will never fail to enthrall. Its a true masterpiece and the best kong movie made up-to date, this will always be in my list of all time greatest movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
Potter17
80 posts |
2011-10-09
|
It doesn't disappoint as a remake. Actually, Peter Jackson's vision of King Kong is more epic, passionate and unforgettable than the original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
grandpajoe6191
504 posts |
2011-09-27
|
"King Kong" is a great summer blockbuster movie that will throw you out of your mind. However, that's as far as the movie can get to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
harlthegr8
6 posts |
2011-08-24
|
Special effects were out of this world awesome, and the storyline was pretty good...BUT...it was about an hour too long! It spends a good 40 minutes of the movie before it even gets to King Kong! then we still have to witness his capture/relationship with Naomi Watts' character, and his tirade in New York City! I have only been able to watch it all the way through in one sitting once. Also, Jack Black just drags the cast down. There are SOO many other great actors in the movie that he sticks out like a sore thumb. Great "try" but I expected better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
saccyind
6 posts |
2011-07-29
|
Jackson's King Kong With Best THE BEST Action Sequences And Great Music By James Newton Howard It's Not A Film But An Anthology Of True Love.Great Film
10/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
1 year
Greenlemonade
26 posts |
2011-07-03
|
This is my least favorite movie of all time.
In his attempt to make King Kong more like Lord of the Rings, Jackson has made an epic exposition of unbelievable events and stupidity. This movie is at least 1 hour too long and every action scene is less plausible than the last, removing all tension and immersion. There are no likable protagonists, villains or heroes and the plot and character development are more childish than an episode of Sponge Bob.
I truly hate this pile of crap that King Kong himself could not excrete from his massive anus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
2 years
VaiKelly
8 posts |
2011-03-24
|
First of all, a three-hour marathon is precisely what I expect from Peter Jackson. I really do! He makes movies like very few in the world - he's precise, thorough, immaculate, and needs a canvass that he can expand as much as he needs. King Kong is not at all boring or lengthy, it is just right for the way Jackson builds his characters up, lets the audience into Kong, into the overall evolution of the movie's plot. It is obvious that Jackson's major emphasis is on Kong and Ann (Naomi Watts), and he takes his time with them. Andy Serkis, who also played Gollum in the Lord of the Ring trilogy, is a chameleon and master of the fantasy-creatures theme. Serkis has given Kong a life of its own, and his interplay with Watts' character is the highlight of the movie. Now, what were Jack Black and Adrien Brody doing is a question that really got to me. I seriously wonder if Carl Denham had been played by, say, Tom Wilkinson, Denham might have been 'logical' for me. Black's too young to play Denham's treacherous, unethical, and callous personality, Wilkinson might have been a logical fit with his age and acting credentials, along with some serious bodyweight loss and a younger-looking make-up! But I'm running into Skull Island fantasy here! I enjoyed the action sequences, Kong's physical specimen is a sight to behold, though that ultimate fight between Kong and the before-mutation dinosaurs, when Kong rescues Ann, was probably too long and lengthy for me. As if Kong wasn't done with three monster dinos, he still has to fight his way through the labyrinth of those eerie vines and climb down to land to fight the 'mother' dino of them all! The final city scenes were captivating, the sound and urgency of the situation was just perfect. Perhaps, just perhaps, Jackson felt that if the audience were led to the 'beauty killed the beast, not the guns' part, the death of Kong would seem cathartic and logical enough. I enjoyed the background score by James Newton Howard who compliments Kong's physical rage with the softest piano and orchestral notes, and yet, elevates it a notch above when the action gets going. All in all, Jackson doesn't disappoint, and neither does Serkis or Watts. Black was the disappointment for me. He was much, much better and natural in his magnum opus, School of Rock. In King Kong, he's just a naturally-good comedy actor trying to portray serious and cunning. He's failed miserably. Which is surprising, because his Ned Schneebly/Dewey Finn was an amazing and finely-balanced performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
2 years
gm101
147 posts |
2011-02-15
|
While the ending wasn't really satisfying, overall, it was a fun ride. And I actually didn't mind the length of the movie, something I criticised Peter Kackson's LOTR trilogy for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
2 years
sreekiran
29 posts |
2010-12-15
|
king kong is the remake of the original movie. there is no novelity in the script. the movie is just a remake.
execution is nice. enthralling and captivating. direction screenplay and technical values are the upper hand to the movie. casting is nice and production values are worthy. the final grade of the movie is B+
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
2 years
MovieLonely94
297 posts |
2010-10-30
|
the minute length was way too longer when its resonant, but that didn't stop Peter Jackson for making this perfect hit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
2 years
Harbinger
22 posts |
2010-08-14
|
King Kong is one of the most memorable and celebrated stories of all-time. This remake or "re-envisioned" version of the original King Kongs is stunning, heartful, and simply unforgettable. Peter Jackson creates a remarkable and haunting Skull Island. King Kong is arguably the greatest CGI character of all-time. Forget 'Avatar', this is CGI at its best. Kong has emotion, cuts, etc. You can practically believe he or any other creature of Skull Island are real, thanks to the superb visuals. Despite the huge runtime, Kong never falters and does justice to its source material-and then some. I truly believe that this version of Kong is the best ever released. Everything is damn-right perfect, and you can't help but cry at the end, even though you already know what is going to happen to Kong. This movie transcends all of its hype and truly engages us on all levels: visual, intellectual and emotional. A true masterpiece. Go see it-now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
You must Register and login to post a comment!.
We currently sort out 99% of overall comments.
Absolutly no allowed: offensive, threatening speech, race, religion,
sexual orientation, culture, nationality and other insults. If your
post don't follow this rule or/and contain at least one single hate or forbidden word like (f**k) it will go to trashbox, don't waste your and our time. |
 |
"King Kong (2005) " Comments
|
| (Discuss, thoughts, opinions, reviews, comments) : |
| |
|
|
|
Registration requred to post comments, Please login or register
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
![]()
 WatchMan |
Due a large amount of 'bad reports' related to our sponsor's links on our new, especially 'now showing in theaters' blockbusters movies pages.
Please note that these are sponsor's text links on all pages and they in no way mean that the sponsors have the movies for streaming or provide links to the movies for streaming. The "Watch Full Movie" links are also sponsor's links promoting XviD codec and Graboid membership. The flash player is a flash banner displaying the ads and it no way that it will play any movies upon installation of XviD codec or Graboid video. We are a movie community that has a great format for in depth movie discussions.
|
 Disclaimer:
Watch-Movies.net.in(Titled as Watch Movies and Watch Movies online) is absolutely legal and contain only comments, reviews, and discussions of movies. We do not provide links to copyrighted material, we do not host any copyrighted material, and we do not link to any sites that link to or host copyrighted material. Watch-movies.net.in list popular movies, new movies, and just released movies merely for reviews and discussions. Watch movies link to sponsor and advertisers where users can watch movies where these sponsors and advertisers have licensed to provide streaming to their paid/trial members. Our current sponsors are and not limited to ireel.com, flixstra.com, graboid.com. watch-movies.net.in is not responsible for the accuracy, compliance, copyright, legality, decency, or any other aspect of the content of other linked sites. If you have any legal issues please contact appropriate media file owners / hosters.
|
|
Movie Genres: 
.gif){kind=small}
18
0
27
15
Movie
Link This Movie :
King Kong (2005) Description :
.jpg){kind=small}
